Goto

Collaborating Authors

 few-shot meta-learning


Bridging the Gap Between Practice and PAC-Bayes Theory in Few-Shot Meta-Learning

Neural Information Processing Systems

Despite recent advances in its theoretical understanding, there still remains a significant gap in the ability of existing PAC-Bayesian theories on meta-learning to explain performance improvements in the few-shot learning setting, where the number of training examples in the target tasks is severely limited. This gap originates from an assumption in the existing theories which supposes that the number of training examples in the observed tasks and the number of training examples in the target tasks follow the same distribution, an assumption that rarely holds in practice. By relaxing this assumption, we develop two PAC-Bayesian bounds tailored for the few-shot learning setting and show that two existing meta-learning algorithms (MAML and Reptile) can be derived from our bounds, thereby bridging the gap between practice and PAC-Bayesian theories. Furthermore, we derive a new computationally-efficient PACMAML algorithm, and show it outperforms existing meta-learning algorithms on several few-shot benchmark datasets.


Dynamic Indoor Fingerprinting Localization based on Few-Shot Meta-Learning with CSI Images

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence

While fingerprinting localization is favored for its effectiveness, it is hindered by high data acquisition costs and the inaccuracy of static database-based estimates. Addressing these issues, this letter presents an innovative indoor localization method using a data-efficient meta-learning algorithm. This approach, grounded in the ``Learning to Learn'' paradigm of meta-learning, utilizes historical localization tasks to improve adaptability and learning efficiency in dynamic indoor environments. We introduce a task-weighted loss to enhance knowledge transfer within this framework. Our comprehensive experiments confirm the method's robustness and superiority over current benchmarks, achieving a notable 23.13\% average gain in Mean Euclidean Distance, particularly effective in scenarios with limited CSI data.